
Feminist Literary Theory focuses on the impact of gender on both reading and writing. It aims to examine how women are represented in comparison to men and how their roles in society differ from each other. Overall, feminism is the idea that women and men should be equal, however, in literature, female characters are often portrayed in social positions that depict them as subordinates to men.

While there are many commonalities in the male-female prisoner experience at Auschwitz-Birkenau, there are also many aspects of the prisoner experience that were unique to women and events which were secluded within the walls of the women’s camp. Both male and female prisoners experienced a different set of threats and challenges, however, the women were more likely to be subjected to sexual harassment and rape. In The Tattooist of Auschwitz, there are multiple occasions in which women are not only oppressed by men and not given a voice, but they are presented as objects that had to satisfy the wishes and commands of men.

Lale, the book’s protagonist, seems to be the only male in the novel that does not oppress women and views them as equals to men. Lale “was attracted to all women, not just physically, but emotionally. He loved talking to them; he loved making them feel good about themselves. To him, all women were beautiful and he believed there was no harm in telling them so” (Morris, 113). In July 1942, while tattooing a group of female arrivals, Lale looked into the eyes of a young girl, Gita Furman. As I have mentioned in my previous blogs, Lale and Gita fall desperately in love with each other and their love is what motivates them to keep on living through the hells of Auschwitz-Birkenau. Lale devotes his happiness to Gita and does anything for her, to ensure that she keeps fighting to live so that they can someday escape and create a life together. Lale respects not only Gita, but all women and expresses how much he adores each women’s individuality. He reveals to his SS guard, Baretski, that to win over a woman, “it’s all about respecting them and what they care about” (Morris, 53).
Granting Lale’s genuine perspective and demeanor towards women, it bears no resemblance to how other men in the novel treat and think of women. An SS Gaurd, Auschwitz Doctor, the head of Birkenau, and a Russian soldier, are all men that have mistreated or molested women. Due to these men’s actions, the women in the novel were mainly represented as sex objects.

Baretski, Lale’s SS minder, seems astonished by Lale’s claim on how to win over a woman: “‘What does it matter what she thinks?’ He begins smirking and yanking at his groin. ‘That’s all I want from them, and that’s what they want from me. I know these things'” (Morris, 54). Baretski does not treat women with respect and this is evident in the way that he talks about them in conversation. It is almost hypocritical in the way that he treats of women because when asked by Lale if he would want other men to treat his sisters the way he treats his girlfriend, he responds angrily, claiming that he would kill any man that did so.

Mengele, Auschwitz’s ‘doctor’ examines women and is permitted to deem them as fit for work, or to otherwise direct them to be exterminated in the gas chambers. His character is extremely cruel and violent as he decides “their fate with a flick of his hand: right, left, right, right, left, left” (Morris, 111). He forcefully grabs a girls face and “twists it backward and forward and up and down, and opens her mouth. (Morris, 112). “He runs his hands over her hair and down her breasts” (Morris, 126). Mengele did not have the intention of helping these women, he only touched them as he desired and decided their fate as to if they would live or die. He objectified the women by placing value on their bodies and then based on his liking towards them, he would decide if they would live or die.

Schwarzhuber, the head of Birchenau, handpicked Cilka, one of Gita’s friends from the women’s camp and forced her to be his personal sex object. “Cilka attempts to cover herself as he rips her shirt open. She feels the back of his hand across her face as she closes her eyes and gives in to the inevitable” (Morris,101). He continually rapes Cilka as often as he pleases and merely treats her as an object of his sexual desire, rather than a whole person. Sexual assault is one of the main feminist issues present in the novel and it is an unacceptable action for a person to ever do to another human being. Cilka’s situation in the book reveals the horrendous circumstances of the occurrence, as she had to give in to the impending abuse so that she would be able to stay alive.
A drunken Russian soldier forced himself upon a young Polish girl, who escaped from Auschwitz with Gita. He intended to rape the young girl until he was stopped by others who knew this was unacceptable. This soldier was aware that the young girl had only just escaped from Auschwitz and how emotionally distraught she was, and yet he attempts to molest her for his own pleasures without her consent.
The male characters attitudes toward women, affected my response to said male characters because I evaluated them based on how they viewed and treated women. I admired Lale because of how he interacted with women and how well he treated them. Whereas I did not typically like Baretski, Mengele, or Schwarzhuber, just solely based on how they chose to disrespect women and objectify their bodies. They each focused on a phallocentric viewpoint and devalued women. They blatantly evaluated or judged women sexually, based on their physical qualities.

In the historical period of WW2, society was still centered around a patriarchal perspective, where the role and imposition of power were held by men. Men dominated roles in the family, community, and workplace. Meanwhile, women were subordinate to the power of the men and were viewed as sex objects. To some extent, this was seen as socially acceptable to view woman this way, due to the time period. This is perhaps why Baretski, Mengele, and Schwarzhuber did not think twice about the way they treated women, because it was normal for women to be considered as a man’s commodity in their lifetime. The Tattooist of Auschwitz seems to reinforce patriarchal society, nonetheless, presenting woman this way in today’s society is completely inappropriate.

Another aspect of the Feminist Theory that is present in The Tattooist of Auschwitz, is the concept of sisterhoods. A sisterhood essentially forms within the women’s camp at Auschwitz. Gita, Dana, Cilka, and Ivana, form a camp-sister relationship that appears to be a gender-specific coping skill to deal with the appalling circumstances of Auschwitz: “Whatever happens, tomorrow will happen to all of them- together they will live or die” (Morris, 210). This sisterhood was created for mutual assistance and strength. These women held on to each other, during the especially brutal times in Auschwitz. The term ‘sisterhood’ is unique to women, because there is no corresponding term describing male friendships. Sometimes the women in sisterhoods were real relatives, but many of the camp sisters met and bonded in Auschwitz, brought together for mutual help to survive the hardships they endured.
In conclusion, concerning Feminist Theory, The Tattooist of Auschwitz moderately affirms the traditional ideas about women and exposes the extent to which women were objectified in the time period, as well as the horrendous hardships that they experienced in Auschwitz, that were specific to females.
Disclaimer: I do not own any of the photos used in my blog post












